It’s funny to me, because years ago, the original call for “diversity” was basically just to have an accurate representation of the real world with all races and sexes and genders. You think you should cast a gay black woman to play Cezar in a Rome history epic? Why? Same goes for changing other races and sexes into white dudes. You have an idea for a badass black gay woman action hero? I’ll watch that gladly. For example - you can show how not enough has changed for the lgbt community from the 60s to today through smart writing that points out some same misguided beliefs people still hold, but on the other hand just making (changing) a LOTR or GOT (or some true hostorical figure) character gay to feel like you are making a contribution to equality and not doing anything meaningful with that is just lazy writing that will have backlash and achieve the opposite of the intended goal.ĮDIT: I am talking about CHANGING characters, not about writing original charatcters. I also feel like you should be a very good writer to pull of social commentary on contemporary political issues through films set in the past. But writing scenes that serve no purpose other than getting your personal agenda across, not so much.

Only seems logical politics are a big part of the story. You have a family reunion where they get in a big argument over politics. Anything in a movie should serve the story or it’s redundant.

Skin do hitler minecraft